not logged in
| re: But Wait, There's More | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 08:21 pm UTC 04/25/07 |
| In reply to: | re: But Wait, There's More - pidunk 02:16 am UTC 04/25/07 |
Can I have a roll call of Americans on the board? > > > > It has absolutely nothing to do with Jim Steinman, not > > unless Harriet Miers is Jims GILF (Granny I'd Like to > > F**k) which I doubt. > > > > I believe it's an attempt to either prove or disprove > > information on a blog or webpage as being actual fact or > > fiction, with the Harriet Miers blog being an example. > > Susan believes it's true, but there's no actual evidence > > to suggest that Harriet Miers actually wrote the blog > > except her name is at the top. > > > > Pud > > > > > Okay, I've read the various posts above and don't feel > like replying one post to one post, so please excuse my > consolidating this here. If you re-read my posts > concerning this, it is clear that I am suspension of > belief as to the origin of this, and state that strong > indications do lend it self to being genuine whilst it may > be revealed in due time to be a prank. > > The question of what this has to do with Jim Steinman is > irrelevant I think, because I did not start the topic, > Ryan did, with a song or some mp3 continuing his "Time For > Reflection" theme, that has as much relevence to Jim > Steinman as perhaps this may seem to. And, the > proliferation of posts NJC, such as the recent string of > missives concerning the Virginia Tech Shootings should by > now make everyone quite accustomed to having diversions on > a less than rare basis on the board. The topic, named > "Susan" is something I feel is what it is because I did > not start it, but I am not straying from content as it is > a topic of some significance at the time that it was > posted. So, GTKarber, thank you for your one bit of input > to me, I shall place on my little mental memo the proper > asterisk as to your generally predisposed attitude, and > move on. If you would like to show me what is parody, you > can show me because I asked you to, and if you would like > to shut up, you can also do that because you probably > don't want to show me what is parody or do anything but > make me look really dumb and naive. What's in your self > esteem? > > Justin, I'm sorry I had the impression you had a something > on blogspot but forgive me I probably got it mixed up with > Ryan's. I apologize to you both for confusing either one > of you at all! :-) > > Am I trying to prove something? Now come on, are you guys > really going to let me prove something if I wanted to? I > know alot better than that!!! How can I prove that this > lady's blog is real, without being in an authoritative > position and ring up Google and say hey chaps who is it > who owns this page, would you tell me? And they would say, > "would you like to have the subpeona written on blue paper > or on green paper? We have a special on today." So, > barring that official sort of validation, the kinds of > viewing I do are those that are as limited as any, but the > fact that this woman could be the key to impeaching Bush, > anyone interested in foraging through the forest of data, > is welcome to take a twig and pitch in. > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: One of the Reasons Why - pidunk 05:53 am UTC 04/26/07 |
| Next: | re: But Wait, There's More - pidunk 05:20 pm UTC 04/24/07 |
| Thread: | |