| re: Swirling Vaporous Veils of Mystery | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 07:57 pm UTC 04/29/07 |
| In reply to: | Swirling Vaporous Veils of Mystery - Scaramouche 12:31 pm UTC 04/29/07 |
> Just been sorting out my Q magazines (212 in all), for > e-bay, and discovered in Q #100 (Jan 1995), that Jim was > part of the judging panel for the Q Awards in 1994. > > Stephen Street won the 'Best Production' award, and Jim is > qouted: > > 'This was easy. Very liberated use of the studio - > cinematic, heightened, stylised - from vaporous veils > swirling mystery around The Cranberries (Everybody Else Is > Doing It So Why Can't We?) to a tough febrile edge on Blur > (Parklife)'. > > Jim seems to like the word 'heightened', as he uses it in > almost every interview? > > Jim likes the concept of something being used to its maximum potential and he calls that accomplishment, "heightened". If he is judging based on this element, he is by no means not going to use the word. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Swirling Vaporous Veils of Mystery - Scaramouche 12:31 pm UTC 04/29/07 |
| Next: | Excalibur - Daniel 07:00 pm UTC 04/28/07 |
| Thread: | |