HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags

Posted by:
Pudding 08:20 pm UTC 04/29/07
In reply to: re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags - pidunk 07:53 pm UTC 04/29/07


> You can tell me, because you think it is bullshit, that
> Jim is not who Jim really is, and you can tell me that
> things you want to be true are true, and things you don't
> want to be true aren't true, and your statements are, as
> you say, bollocks. I am not going to go without my comment
> here, that my entire lifetime of life experience and
> training, little as it is in comparison with
> professionals, is untrue. Broadway is as appealing as it
> is to those who seek it out because it is the Broadway
> Community, not the perhaps revolutionistically aspired,
> Broadway Conglomerate. You can't take over a culture
> simply by declaring it non-existent.

Do you set yourself a target each day of how much nonsense you can say?

I've never said Jim isn't who Jim is, you have Mrs.Jimbles.

I'm guessing you didn't care to read fully what I said after what you did (it's difficult I know) In short I'll summarise, please try and keep up:

You claimed that having 200 investors of a show was "the nature of Broadway" and I replied It might be for the odd show or two, but it isn't the nature.

Pud



reply |

Previous: re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags - pidunk 07:53 pm UTC 04/29/07
Next: re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags - pidunk 08:35 pm UTC 04/29/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE