| re: "the three new songs" -- ?? | |
|
Posted by: |
The_Jackster 01:36 am UTC 05/24/07 |
| In reply to: | "the three new songs" -- ?? - Wilbury 01:33 am UTC 05/24/07 |
| We're considering a Royal Albert Hall concert to benefit the Great Ormond Street Hospital (who used to own all rights to PETER PAN, and have been lovely to deal with (just want them to be "happy"). The concert will be "stars" doing BAT 1 & 2 songs as well as THREE new BAT songs. ("We're Still The Children We Once Were"; "What Part Of My Body Hurts The Most"; and "Who Needs the Young"? December 28, 2006, 4:05 AM > Why do you assume Body / Children / Young are all in it? > And secondly, you forgot PIG, which has been CONFIRMED to > be in it in Jim's blog. > > And I'm not so sure Jim IS restricting himself to just Bat > 1 and 2 songs... I'd love BfG to be in it (and hell, it > *is* on bat 3, like Pig. Sad but 'true'!). > > > > Apart from the three new songs (Body, Children & Young > > -sounds like a firm of lawyers), Jim seems to be > > restricting the show to just Bat 1 & 2 songs? > > > > If the story is sticking to his earlier visions of > > Neverland, I would have thought stuff like Surf's Up, Bad > > For Good, Everything Is Permitted & All Coming Back would > > be more suited than say Paradise, Anything For Love & 2/3 > > ?? > > > > Perhaps the story/book is radically different now? > > > > I don't wanna see Jim 'shoe horn' in unsuitable songs, > > like so many jukebox musicals. > > > > As long as Bat is in the show, does he really need to > > restrict himself to the two albums only? | |
| URL: | Believe it |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | "the three new songs" -- ?? - Wilbury 01:33 am UTC 05/24/07 |
| Next: | Cool, thanks for the link, but... - Wilbury 01:44 am UTC 05/24/07 |
| Thread: |
|