Yeah, the CONCERT will be songs from Bat 1 and 2 and those three new songs.
So, cool, those songs are probably in the show -- I'd completely forgotten about that. But he's ALSO stated (in much more detail) that so is PIG, and so that list of songs that comprise the concert is not an exhaustive description of songs in the show. So the show could still hold anything?
> We're considering a Royal Albert Hall concert to
> benefit the Great Ormond Street Hospital (who used to own
> all rights to PETER PAN, and have been lovely to deal with
> (just want them to be "happy"). The concert will be
> "stars" doing BAT 1 & 2 songs as well as THREE new BAT
> songs. ("We're Still The Children We Once Were"; "What
> Part Of My Body Hurts The Most"; and "Who Needs the
> Young"?
>
> December 28, 2006, 4:05 AM
>
> > Why do you assume Body / Children / Young are all in it?
> > And secondly, you forgot PIG, which has been CONFIRMED to
> > be in it in Jim's blog.
> >
> > And I'm not so sure Jim IS restricting himself to just Bat
> > 1 and 2 songs... I'd love BfG to be in it (and hell, it
> > *is* on bat 3, like Pig. Sad but 'true'!).
> >
> >
> > > Apart from the three new songs (Body, Children & Young
> > > -sounds like a firm of lawyers), Jim seems to be
> > > restricting the show to just Bat 1 & 2 songs?
> > >
> > > If the story is sticking to his earlier visions of
> > > Neverland, I would have thought stuff like Surf's Up, Bad
> > > For Good, Everything Is Permitted & All Coming Back would
> > > be more suited than say Paradise, Anything For Love & 2/3
> > > ??
> > >
> > > Perhaps the story/book is radically different now?
> > >
> > > I don't wanna see Jim 'shoe horn' in unsuitable songs,
> > > like so many jukebox musicals.
> > >
> > > As long as Bat is in the show, does he really need to
> > > restrict himself to the two albums only?
|
