>
>
> > > She neither knows anything about them or myself
> >
> > Give it a day or two and she'll convince herself that you
> > are the new Jim Steinman and then tell everyone you both
> > go barracuda fishing or some such nonsense.
> >
> > Like I said in an earlier post, Susan's nuttier than
> > squirrel shit.
>
> I do agree, but implying that myself or my children are
> under investigation (which is not true) or twisting a
> commentary on innocent children's games (playing "house"
> or "getting married" with bubble gum rings) into implying
> "sexual emphasis" in a child's life is both demented and
> derogatory.
>
> According to the laws regarding children's privacy and
> rights, it's also illegal to imply that a child is abused,
> endangered, etc.
I implied nothing of that. All these words are coming from you. The phrases about wondering, and about where from, do not imply anything, it inquires. So do investigations inquire. An investigation is something that is a fact finding mission. A harem is one that has time-tested connotation of sexual emphasis....what do husbands and wives do? Questions abound about what you leave on your computer screen, what you leave out in the open for your children to see. If Children Services has not asked you that, then I sure didn't tell them to ask you that, but you apparently just did. So, what do you want to accomplish, exactly?
You write like there is no pervasive tone of incorrectness about you.....and then you say damn the reader for reading!
|
