not logged in
| re: supplemental reply | |
Posted by:  |
fallingtofly 02:06 pm UTC 06/05/07 |
| In reply to: | supplemental reply - pidunk 05:17 am UTC 06/05/07 |
| And THAT constitutes copyright infringement. If you had half the intelligence of a goldfish, you would have read the disclaimer that was on that blog- "All writings in this blog are copyrighted by the author, Renee Blaine, and may not be reproduced without her express written permission." You dumb bitch, it's on all of my sites, especially ANY of them that are related to my writing, even temporarily as that one was. Strike three. > > > > Even though the file is large, I shall post the image I > lifted of the Xanga blog which fallingtofly stopped > linking to the Rockman Record in her effort to cover it up > after my statement. She took out her erotic avatar soon > afterwards. It is not a fault of any reader to have a > reaction to what they read. What she has written gave to > me many questions, which I felt justified in wondering. I > made no insults, statements and implications which she did > not herself make, and which I did not read into what she > had written based on universally accepted definitions of > words, prevalent trends of popular culture, and the caring > for the welfare of children. A question is a question, a > statement is a statement. When it becomes illegal to ask a > question, then the complete end of free speech is arrived. > Needless to say, that circumspection of such is > appropriate, which is exactly why I stated what I did. The > most circumspect form of inquiry is exactly what I > provided. Any other phrasing would have been inflammatory. > The phrasing I made was not. She could have replied, in a > flame to me, saying anything, without blowing up in > defensive diatribes about her fitness as a mother or the > environment of her family. How many other posts are so > belittling to what I say here? How many are simply phrases > that tell me I'm a nutter, or tell me that I am a bitch. > How many other phrases tell me that I have no purpose for > breathing? In all the reactions that fallingtofly could > have chosen, she also could have chosen to ask, what > investigations, and shut me up, because clearly, I could > not say anything more. But her path was something entirely > else. I did not intend to begin an entire thing here. I > merely wanted to focus the feelings that I had at the > readings I did, of her writing. > > In anticipating she would change her blog, I made a photo > capture of it. I was very much affected by it. If it is a > crime to feel emotion, what can I say. I felt emotion. > > > > > > > > > > > > Susan you mad bitch. Who the HELL do you thiunk you are. > > > Making remarks about posters members of family. > > > > I made no remarks about members of her family: read > > carefully, those remarks are hers. I simply responded. > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | supplemental reply - pidunk 05:17 am UTC 06/05/07 |
| Next: | re: supplemental reply - pidunk 01:01 am UTC 06/06/07 |
| Thread: |
|