not logged in
| re: Rory With Bonnie | |
Posted by:  |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 08:38 am UTC 06/13/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Rory With Bonnie - pidunk 09:20 pm UTC 06/12/07 |
I am educated. Listen I may have been worong to go out you like I have done in past posts. But its simply is against my charcter to belive something that contridicts what I have belived to be the truth. Although you seem genuine. I cant beleive some of the suff you read. Which is me being me. Nothing against you personanlly. Post in my thread about Songs that fit the situation if yohave such a memoery in your life. It would be interesting to see how many have been in a situation like that > > I assumed you are educated, but I was wrong. Opinions are > never discredited, because they are opinions. They are > yours no matter what anyone says until you change it > yourself. A fact is something that gets discredited, or a > person is someone who gets discredited. I do not discredit > opinions because, as I said, an opinion cannot be > discredited. When someone has a different opinion than > yours they do not discredit your opinion, they only > disagree with your opinion. I do not even disagree with > your opinion, because your opinion is based on your > feelings, and only you have your feelings. Feelings can > not be discredited because they are feelings. > > I say things I say which are different from what any of > you others say including you because the things mean what > they mean to me which are different than what they mean to > you. The meaning I take from his works has to be different > from what you take, because my experience is not your > experience. But your experience stays yours, as my > experience stays mine. > > Above you mention "You Took The Words Right Out Of My > Mouth" and I enjoyed reading how you felt that you were in > a moment like that. I can see why you feel that way. It is > definitely true that you had the ability to relate to that > song. I am glad when someone can relate in their own ways > to any of Jim's songs, and yours is a really good example. > It does not mean that someone else can't relate to it in a > different way. And when I say that I relate to the song, > it is different from the way I might relate to another > songwriter's song. I relate to Jim's songs when he may > have placed shared common experiences between he and I > into it. If I told you what this song "You Took The Words > Right Out Of My Mouth" refers to, it should not change > your ability to relate to the song in your own way, for > your experience in your own life. He wrote it in a way so > that you could. > > > > > > Right I was trying to amke peace then. I did not at one > > point try to affend you in thr pervious post. Sorry if you > > thihnk that I did but it was was not my intention. But > > oncve mpre you have discredited my opinion. And I will > > choose tp persove spngs the way I want them to. Not the > > way you want me to. > > > > > > > > > > Not wanting to stir things again. Bit I read all I can in > > > > that song. Mayber it differs from your perception of the > > > > song. But its my opinion. So please to not just mereley > > > > discredit it. > > > > > > > > > I am not discrediting your perception of the song. > > > However, you can't tell John Denver that he didn't write > > > Annie's Song for Annie. Yet married couples worldwide > > > dedicate that song to each other in bliss and joy within > > > their own unique loves. Have your meaning, and let me have > > > mine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >But you are right. I do find I can relate > > > > that song to a past situation. Despite not believing you. > > > > > > I give you only logical constructs. You say, gee your > > > logic was right, but I don't believe you. One does not > > > have anything to do with another. There is only one > > > purpose served by repeating constantly that I am not to be > > > believed, and that has an agenda, and all agendas are > > > political. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BEcause I go with established fact. > > > > > > > > > You do not know established fact. You are nowhere where > > > you can know any established fact. It does not matter how > > > much you read if you misinterpret what you read, and it > > > does not matter how much of falsehoods you read if you > > > think false is fact. If you go with established fact, > > > sometime you wanted to know fact, or some connection > > > between you and the established fiction exists. I have no > > > time for you. > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Rory With Bonnie - pidunk 09:20 pm UTC 06/12/07 |
| Next: | re: Rory With Bonnie - pidunk 09:18 am UTC 06/13/07 |
| Thread: |
|