not logged in
| re: Rory With Bonnie | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 09:20 pm UTC 06/12/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Rory With Bonnie - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 02:49 pm UTC 06/12/07 |
I assumed you are educated, but I was wrong. Opinions are never discredited, because they are opinions. They are yours no matter what anyone says until you change it yourself. A fact is something that gets discredited, or a person is someone who gets discredited. I do not discredit opinions because, as I said, an opinion cannot be discredited. When someone has a different opinion than yours they do not discredit your opinion, they only disagree with your opinion. I do not even disagree with your opinion, because your opinion is based on your feelings, and only you have your feelings. Feelings can not be discredited because they are feelings. I say things I say which are different from what any of you others say including you because the things mean what they mean to me which are different than what they mean to you. The meaning I take from his works has to be different from what you take, because my experience is not your experience. But your experience stays yours, as my experience stays mine. Above you mention "You Took The Words Right Out Of My Mouth" and I enjoyed reading how you felt that you were in a moment like that. I can see why you feel that way. It is definitely true that you had the ability to relate to that song. I am glad when someone can relate in their own ways to any of Jim's songs, and yours is a really good example. It does not mean that someone else can't relate to it in a different way. And when I say that I relate to the song, it is different from the way I might relate to another songwriter's song. I relate to Jim's songs when he may have placed shared common experiences between he and I into it. If I told you what this song "You Took The Words Right Out Of My Mouth" refers to, it should not change your ability to relate to the song in your own way, for your experience in your own life. He wrote it in a way so that you could. > Right I was trying to amke peace then. I did not at one > point try to affend you in thr pervious post. Sorry if you > thihnk that I did but it was was not my intention. But > oncve mpre you have discredited my opinion. And I will > choose tp persove spngs the way I want them to. Not the > way you want me to. > > > > > > > Not wanting to stir things again. Bit I read all I can in > > > that song. Mayber it differs from your perception of the > > > song. But its my opinion. So please to not just mereley > > > discredit it. > > > > > > I am not discrediting your perception of the song. > > However, you can't tell John Denver that he didn't write > > Annie's Song for Annie. Yet married couples worldwide > > dedicate that song to each other in bliss and joy within > > their own unique loves. Have your meaning, and let me have > > mine. > > > > > > > > > > >But you are right. I do find I can relate > > > that song to a past situation. Despite not believing you. > > > > I give you only logical constructs. You say, gee your > > logic was right, but I don't believe you. One does not > > have anything to do with another. There is only one > > purpose served by repeating constantly that I am not to be > > believed, and that has an agenda, and all agendas are > > political. > > > > > > > > > > > > > BEcause I go with established fact. > > > > > > You do not know established fact. You are nowhere where > > you can know any established fact. It does not matter how > > much you read if you misinterpret what you read, and it > > does not matter how much of falsehoods you read if you > > think false is fact. If you go with established fact, > > sometime you wanted to know fact, or some connection > > between you and the established fiction exists. I have no > > time for you. > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Rory With Bonnie - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 02:49 pm UTC 06/12/07 |
| Next: | re: Rory With Bonnie - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 08:38 am UTC 06/13/07 |
| Thread: |
|