| re: Bad For Good (the song) |
|
Posted by:
 |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 09:34 am UTC 06/16/07 |
| In reply to: |
Bad For Good (the song) - Wilbury 06:27 am UTC 06/16/07 |
|
It would have sounded is excellent. But Jims original version is so good. But I do have a live version of BFG(the one with or inal sin at the start> At this is incredable. When meat slows the third verse down. Something the could work (well) live
It's just hit me that I wish Bad For Good was on Bat 2. My
> reasons for thinking this are two fold:
>
> 1. it sounds ACE on the Lost Boys and Golden Girls tour
> (as does the song Lost Boys itself).
>
> 2. But more importantly, the bat 2 version of Frying Pan
> makes the original look and sound PUNY in comparison. And
> I really like the original, I think it's great. But the
> Bat 2 version makes it sound wimpy. Imagine if Jim could
> have done the same thing with BfG!! It would be the most
> unbelievale thing to hear!
>
> Personally I think Jim and Rinkoff should DEFINITELY
> re-record the song with somebody. The Dream Engine. Or
> someone affiliated to it.
>
> Meat seems completely unwilling to commit to singing well
> in the studio, instead opting to make demands of being
> able to work with vocal producers that don't push him as
> hard and produce a sub-standard result. So I think the
> opportunity for Jim to work with Meat on something new in
> the studio is well and truly passed, as much as it pains
> me to admit it. I have found his live recordings
> unlistenable for many years now, but it's sad to lose his
> studio finesse as well.
>
> And LASTLY (as an added bonus), if BfG HAD been recorded
> for Bat 2, Desmond would never have had the chance to fuck
> it up!! :o)
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Todd on BfG - Space_Monkey 01:28 pm UTC 06/18/07 |
| Next: |
re: Bad For Good (the song) - Ali 10:55 am UTC 06/18/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|