| re: ELO part 2 + Jim... |
|
Posted by:
 |
rockfenris2005 09:36 am UTC 06/16/07 |
| In reply to: |
re: ELO part 2 + Jim, not that crazy a thought. - Wilbury 09:32 am UTC 06/16/07 |
|
I don't know a lot about Electric Light Orchestra but, they actually reunited post-1990? Do tell.
> Oh yeah, I remember reading about the ELO part 2 + Asia
> thing as well.
>
> To be honest I never really cared that much because a) ELO
> part 2 are a bunch of boring wankers and b) I never
> thought there was any real significance or truth to it.
>
> But I see what you're saying, perhaps ELO part 2 is the
> result of the peripheral ELO band members (ie ELO minus
> Jeff Lynne and Richard Tandy, who in a round about way are
> the only two ingredients needed for most of what the later
> ELO did) meeting with Jim, and hitting it off with Eric
> Troyer and doing their own thing after that.
>
> Of course, that leaves pretty much all of the late 80s
> unaccounted for as far as the ELO band members are
> concerned. So the chronology still doesn't sit well with
> me. But it's sounding like a plausable theory?
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: ELO part 2 + Jim, not that crazy a thought. - Wilbury 09:32 am UTC 06/16/07 |
| Next: |
re: ELO part 2 + Jim... - Wilbury 09:50 am UTC 06/16/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|