| re: Jim has authorized me to give Susan a message | |
|
Posted by: |
Rob 11:41 am UTC 08/17/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim has authorized me to give Susan a message - Pudding 03:20 am UTC 08/17/07 |
| > > A better question would be, why go postal when somebody > > doesn't believe the same thing as you? Fans who believe > > different things from you pose no threat whatsoever. > > That example, which was one of many I could've chosen, > wasn't about someone agreeing or disagreeing with somebody > else, it was blatant delusional bullshit. You try and > paint a different picture of it if you want, but it's > complete and utter bollocks what she wrote. > > Instead of asking people to change their opinion of Susan > and treat her nicely so they're not 'ganging up on her' as > you put it, get her to change her ways so people actually > see her differently. If she didn't post as a nutter, then > people wouldn't see her as a nutter. I cannot, for the life of me understand why Susan's posts piss you & Smeg off SOOOO MUCH. Most (if not all) of the posters on this board know enough about Jim Steinman to recognise a bit of bullshit when we see it, whether it is delusional or not, so why do you feel the need to attack with such vitriol everytime she posts? What does it achieve? I cannot believe that two such obviously intelligent people feel the need to act like little children in the face of such harmless fantasy. Get over yourselves - this is an internet forum dedicated to a songwriter; it doesn't change the world, it doesn't physically hurt anyone and Susan's posts veer from mildly amusing to mildly annoying, but no more. Get over yourselves the pair of you. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim has authorized me to give Susan a message - Pudding 03:20 am UTC 08/17/07 |
| Next: | re: Jim has authorized me to give Susan a message - pidunk 02:07 am UTC 08/18/07 |
| Thread: |
|