| re: Jim's Blog | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 07:04 am UTC 09/07/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim's Blog - AndrewG 10:09 am UTC 09/06/07 |
> Seems a bit of a coincidence only you and bright eyes talk > about this jim cypherd fuck though. No, we have not talked about the Jim Cypherd fuck, but if you want us to begin talking about our sex lives we could...but you complained when I answered someone's inquiry about Jim's loss of virginity. So, I think we'll pass. >I mean what the hell > has he got to do with Jim Steinman's music or any good > music for that matter! (and no I'm not wanting a 32 page > explanation thank you) Without Jim Cypherd there would have never been any Jim Steinman music, period. None. Not a note, not a syllable, not a voice, not a song. Jim Cypherd is the gentleman photo'd in the white gloves above, and on my avatar. Jim Steinman is elsewhere photo'd in the black gloves above. He could explain quite alot, but without Jim Cypherd, there would be nothing to explain. > > > > > I am not Bright_Eyes and Bright_Eyes is not me. Just > > because someone highly intelligent and SANE comes along, > > does not make them ME. I'm not the only sane person here > > :) > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim's Blog - AndrewG 10:09 am UTC 09/06/07 |
| Next: | re: Jim's Blog - Pudding 07:08 am UTC 09/07/07 |
| Thread: |
|