HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Whistle gets a second wind

Posted by:
Smeghead 09:57 pm UTC 09/09/07
In reply to: re: Whistle gets a second wind - pidunk 09:34 pm UTC 09/09/07

You are a lying cunt, so who cares what you have to say? If your doctors need any help coming up with a way to finish you off faster send them my e-mail address I have some lovely ideas...

>
>
> > The sad thing is that audiences are going to see this
> > nuetered version and thinks it is the real show. There
> > was nothing confusing about the London show. Taking the
> > show and making it family friendly and focusing on the
> > kids makes it a disneyfied thing killing it's soul. I
> > remember when the London show came out ALW said that it
> > was the one show of his he felt was perfect and he
> > wouldn't change anything. Now he says it needed
> > changing.
>
>
> One of Jim Cypherd's phrases spoken to me which I remember
> well, (I love some of his phrases) applies to a situation
> such as this..."Life changes, things change". Since its
> inception, it has been experiencing evolutions, as life
> gives evolutions. I think of WDTW like this: it has a
> message, that one could not make assumptions, that
> assumptions can easily be made; it has another message,
> that mass insanity is a phenomenon that can both originate
> from and be brought to children, with rebellions on either
> side. It also shows how one very unethical man can mislead
> a group of people to his benefit, which upsets the order
> of everything in their lives, and hurts all involved. The
> play revolves around a ruse set from a misunderstanding,
> which is not corrected. The absence of correction, is the
> very thread that pulls the elements together of the entire
> story.
>
> However this story gets told, and whoever would heed its
> messages is bound to love the music, and be enchanted by
> the children on the stage. If the adults are cast well, I
> would be glad to see it, and I do not know what could be
> "disneyfied" of it, when Disney themselves put the
> atrocity of Anastasia on the screen. I ran into one of the
> men of Disney's heyday yesterday and listened to him talk,
> and he discussed the ways that Disney was in the forties,
> and does not consider the Disney of today to be the same.
> One thing he said was, "They talk too much. In the old
> Disney, not the Corporate Disney, which they are now, the
> characters talked just as much as they had to, not all the
> time. I see Disney things now and say to myself, that
> there is much, too much talking and noise. It's nothing
> like Disney used to be." I paraphrase, but this is what he
> said and I wasn't able to catch his name, as I was
> eavesdropping on a conversation he was having in public
> with someone else.
>
> I don't like "Anastasia" because it should never have been
> made, and as made, has elements which are highly
> misleading, things that are too accurate for my comfort,
> mixed together in a story about swindlers accidentally
> stumbling on the genuine article. In it, Rasputin is
> depicted as a would-be murderer, when his nature was the
> exact opposite, and whose death brought by the success of
> several sequential murder attempts, is the single most
> important element that brought the Russian Revolution to
> the fore. Vilifying Rasputin in this Disney production, is
> horrifyingly political, and horrifying at all, because
> this man had a large family who must bear the burden of
> false information about their ancestor.
>
> Whistle Down The Wind stands on its own without such
> analogies, and if a cast is made which supports the story,
> it should be as successful and wonderful as anticipated.
>
>
> >
> > > Whistle gets a second wind
> > > Musical transplants popular English novel and film to
> > > rural Louisiana in the 1950s
> > >
> > > By EVERETT EVANS
> > > Copyright 2007 Houston Chronicle
> > >
> > > Whistle Down the Wind at last gets a second chance with
> > > U.S. audiences, courtesy of the national tour that opens
> > > Thursday at Hobby Center, presented here by Theatre Under
> > > The Stars.
> > >
> > > Based on Mary Hayley Bell's 1958 novel and the 1961 film
> > > version that starred a teenage Hayley Mills (the author's
> > > daughter) and Alan Bates, Whistle centers on 16-year-old
> > > Swallow and her two younger siblings, who encounter an
> > > escaped convict and become convinced he is Christ.
> > >
> > > The Andrew Lloyd Webber musical's pre-Broadway tryout
> > > opened in December 1996 in Washington, D.C. Interest was
> > > high, as the show reunited the composer with director Hal
> > > Prince, who had staged two of Lloyd Webber's greatest
> > > successes, Evita and Phantom of the Opera, and gave the
> > > composer a new lyricist in rock songwriter Jim Steinman
> > > (Total Eclipse of the Heart, Bat Out of Hell).
> > >
> > > But while business was solid, the critical reception was
> > > poor. Even the creators agreed Whistle wasn't working. The
> > > Broadway opening was canceled. That was the last U.S.
> > > audiences saw of Whistle, till now.
> > >
> > > In the intervening decade, Whistle went on a long journey
> > > that brings it back to these shores in much-altered form,
> > > thanks to London impresario Bill Kenwright, best known as
> > > producer-director of the long-running Blood Brothers.
> > >
> > > Kenwright came on board to make revisions to a version
> > > that premiered in London in 1998. Reviews remained mixed,
> > > yet everyone agreed his treatment was more focused on the
> > > characters and displayed the show to better advantage than
> > > it had been seen.
> > >
> > > "Andrew became this production's biggest fan," Kenwright
> > > says. "He said, 'I can see the show now. This is the one I
> > > want to go to the U.S.' "
> > >
> > > "Bill has always been passionate about this story," Lloyd
> > > Webber says. "He gave the show simplicity, stripping it to
> > > the bare bones. He understands the essence of the piece,
> > > the delicate balance between the innocence of the girl and
> > > her sexual awakening."
> > >
> > > One might suspect Lloyd Webber initially was drawn to the
> > > property because of its religious overtones. After all, he
> > > made his name with Jesus Christ Superstar, and here was a
> > > tale whose leading man was the nearest thing, someone
> > > assumed to be Christ by its leading lady.
> > >
> > > "No, it wasn't that at all," Lloyd Webber replies. "I was
> > > drawn to its story of childhood innocence, blind faith and
> > > adolescent sexuality. We don't know if the Man (as he
> > > called in the show) is a murderer or not, but that these
> > > children believe he could be Jesus Christ. And as the girl
> > > becomes more infatuated, how far will this relationship
> > > go?"
> > >
> > > Early in planning the musical version, Lloyd Webber
> > > changed the story's locale from Lancashire, in England's
> > > North Country, to rural Louisiana in the late 1950s. He
> > > felt transplanting the tale to the Bible Belt would help
> > > explain the children's leap of faith in mistaking the
> > > fugitive.
> > >
> > > "That kind of belief that used to be found in small-town
> > > rural England doesn't exist anymore," Lloyd Webber says.
> > > "What's more, setting it in the U.S. at the time when rock
> > > music was first coming to backwater Louisiana would give
> > > it an edge and let me return to my rock roots."
> > >
> > > Another factor is that, when Whistle was planned in the
> > > mid-'90s, it was conceived as an original film musical;
> > > the U.S. setting was thought to have a broader appeal.
> > >
> > > But before the film got under way, the score was offered
> > > in concert form at the Chichester Festival. "That went so
> > > well," the composer recalls, "that there was immediate
> > > interest in a stage production. Hal Prince heard about it
> > > and wanted to direct. Because of my history with him, I
> > > let it proceed as a stage musical."
> > >
> > > Lloyd Webber says that was one of the problems with the
> > > D.C. premiere: What had been constructed as a film had not
> > > been sufficiently reworked for the stage.
> > >
> > > "When it opened in Washington," Kenwright recalls, "I went
> > > to see it, and it was a mess."
> > >
> > > That was especially painful to Kenwright, because he'd
> > > heard some of Lloyd Webber's music for the show early on
> > > and asked to be involved. "But for many reasons, at that
> > > point, he was already set to go with other people."
> > >
> > > Kenwright's affection for the project goes all the way
> > > back to the original movie.
> > >
> > > "It's one of the most famous and loved films of all time
> > > in Britain," Kenwright says. "I remember seeing it at 14
> > > and immediately going out and buying the Decca single of
> > > the Wayfarers singing the movie theme, as well as the Mary
> > > Hayley Bell novel. I've always loved its story about the
> > > innocence of children."
> > >
> > > Viewing simplicity as the tale's great virtue, Kenwright
> > > cringed when he attended the show's 1996 world premiere,
> > > which he considered overproduced.
> > >
> > > "Simplicity is the greatest gift you can give an audience.
> > > When you have actors onstage doing good material, you
> > > don't need to cloud it with a lot of this and that. Seeing
> > > it in D.C., I was immediately thinking of what to get rid
> > > of, how to focus it."
> > >
> > > After the original London run, Kenwright finally got that
> > > chance when he took charge of the show for its first U.K.
> > > tour.
> > >
> > > "I sat in a room with the script and score for two days,
> > > with a couple of actors reading through it, and just took
> > > the whole thing back to basics. And we toured for a year
> > > to sold-out houses and standing ovations."
> > >
> > > As to the perhaps far-fetched premise of the three
> > > children mistaking the fugitive, Kenwright says "it's my
> > > job as director to make the audience accept it. And in
> > > this production, so far as I've seen, the audience never
> > > questions it."
> > >
> > > Kenwright says that, while Whistle is somewhat dark, he's
> > > proud it's a show children can attend.
> > >
> > > "It's about children. There are 25 kids in the show. And
> > > it's great that children are coming back into the theater
> > > to see it."
> > >
> > > Kenwright recognizes that U.S. audiences are a "different
> > > breed" than British audiences. And that, with a new cast
> > > performing it, the dynamic of the show may change somewhat
> > > from the version that registered so well during the U.K.
> > > tour and the show's return to London.
> > >
> > > "But I have never been as convinced about anything,"
> > > Kenwright says, "as I am that U.S. audiences will take
> > > this show to their hearts."


reply |

Previous: re: Whistle gets a second wind - Leesa 12:11 am UTC 09/10/07
Next: re: Whistle gets a second wind - Jacqueline 10:47 pm UTC 09/09/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE