| re: Whistle gets a second wind | |
|
Posted by: |
Leesa (gallytrotter@mchsi.com) 12:11 am UTC 09/10/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Whistle gets a second wind - Rob 11:10 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
| Bravo Rob, Good post! There isn't even a photo of Cypherd on the web--oh! I guess that's really the 'Jim' in the white gloves on the top of this page, right? The one and only--at least this week. There IS a Cypherd, but you're right--he apparently doesn't seek recognition to the point Susan's fantasies betray--and you're right--betrayal it is! How ghastly to have your personal history and moments trotted over a public format. Speaks volumes. About many. Leesa J > Let's face facts - if Jim Cypherd wanted recognition for > what he has done he would claim it. If he doesn't, then > you aren't doing him any favours by yakking about him on > here are you? > > In fact, you seem to me to be a very poor friend for Mr > Cypherd, the way you talk about his most intimate secrets > in public and hold him up to ridicule on this board. > Surely if you were really his friend and you really cared > for him, then you would not post such details as you have, > but rather keep his secret just that - a secret... > > Just a thought. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Who? - pidunk 12:29 am UTC 09/10/07 |
| Next: | re: Whistle gets a second wind - Smeghead 09:57 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
| Thread: | |