| re: Whistle gets a second wind |
|
Posted by:
|
Rob 11:10 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
| In reply to: |
re: Whistle gets a second wind - pidunk 11:05 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
|
Let's face facts - if Jim Cypherd wanted recognition for what he has done he would claim it. If he doesn't, then you aren't doing him any favours by yakking about him on here are you?
In fact, you seem to me to be a very poor friend for Mr Cypherd, the way you talk about his most intimate secrets in public and hold him up to ridicule on this board. Surely if you were really his friend and you really cared for him, then you would not post such details as you have, but rather keep his secret just that - a secret...
Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Whistle gets a second wind - pidunk 11:27 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
| Next: |
Who? - pidunk 12:29 am UTC 09/10/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|