| re: The Question of 'Imposter /Multiple Personality' Postings | |
|
Posted by: |
Rob 12:40 pm UTC 09/16/07 |
| In reply to: | re: The Question of 'Imposter /Multiple Personality' Postings - Leesa 09:59 pm UTC 09/15/07 |
| Great post Leesa and I totally agree. > That is my attitude and it's how I conduct myself > here--which might be why I'm not a very popular poster > here either--9 years here and alot gets said, just like in > a real community. You emass baggage, good and bad, people > recognise a poster's 'user name' and just skip all of > those from that poster. I can see where a newbie name > would be treated with at least a lack of bias. And we're > ALL guilty of biases here, admit it or not. Even with > posters we know very little about--we already have > something of a formed opinion as to whether reading their > post is worth our time. And to go back and 'face the > music' connected with past controversy every time you > post, especially if it's something Jim-related that merits > a fair hearing amongst the Jim experts here, then what the > hell--there is indeed a place for that and I would back > Sturse on his defence there. Like JD rightly observed, > 'I'd hate to be sick or weak amongst this crowd'--the > Steinfans have always been a tough crowd, especially in > defending Jim. But they're pretty ruthless on fellow > posters as well. I tell you, if I profoundly pissed off > this group, I wouldn't come back!!! I respect most > everyone here so very much that I'd be more heartsick than > fearful, but I understand what Sturse is saying and it > might be time for all of us to cut people just a little > more slack at times--I mean those worthy of having slack > cut! (Hey, I'm still a Steinfan here and part of the > obsessive dysfunction!) > Leesa | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: The Question of 'Imposter /Multiple Personality' Postings - Leesa 09:59 pm UTC 09/15/07 |
| Next: | re: The Question of 'Imposter /Multiple Personality' Postings - Pudding 10:37 pm UTC 09/16/07 |
| Thread: |
|