| re: It's not about paying for RR... | |
|
Posted by: |
Leesa (gallytrotter@mchsi.com) 08:11 pm UTC 09/19/07 |
| In reply to: | re: It's not about paying for RR... - Pudding 02:54 am UTC 09/19/07 |
| I got involved because I was following the thread and found it interesting--it's not like it's private e-mail. And yeah, I know Bakewell's in Derbyshire--it sticks in my mind because I believe we always went through that station on the way up to York--only time we ever went north! But just a beautiful area. Oh--and wasn't Rob the one you accused of ass-kissing when he praised JD for booting Susan? Anyway, that was the WTF? about that. As for the Chronicles, if someone thinks they have enough material and time, hell yes, give it a go--could be worhtwhile. And yes, I'd have no problem with paying for it. My point alone is that their purpose and period of time they were in is very different from now. But by all means, if someone wants to try they will most likely find some likely takers. Leesa > Firstly, not sure why you've got yourself involved, but > anyway. > > He diplomatically agreed with JD...WTF? what ARE you > talking about? > > As Rob rightfully pointed out in an earlier post, he > probably doesn't mean to disagree with everything I say, > but he pretty much does, which kinda twists my tits a > little. Especially when he doesn't give alternatives, just > disagreements. That might not be 100% accurate, but it's > pretty much how I'm seeing it. > > That aside, I think I'd be pretty much correct in saying > Rob (and not only Rob I might add) would and is > complaining about paying for something like a NC, but > would be more than willing to put their name down to > receive that very same item if it was for free and not > even bother with a donation for running costs, however big > or small. Now again, that might not be 100% accurate, but > I haven't seen anything to suggest otherwise. > > People are shooting down The Neverland Chronicles idea > because they're basing it on whats gone before, which is > being completely unfair to the whole idea. The NC WOULDN'T > be just a retrospective of Steinman's career, and any > retrospectiveness would be from a completely different > angle than what's already on this site, and talking about > many other facets of Jims past that either aren't > mentioned or fully mentioned on this site. The NC WOULDN'T > just have fans thoughts etc. There'd hopefully be > Steingatherings mentioned, a calendar of events, new, > unused and alternate lyrics. New interviews with Jim, > Steven Rinkoff and any other person who works closely with > Jim. Maybe a free CD now and again with a demo or two or > three on it. > > Those are just some possiblities of what could be inside, > but there's a whole lot more that isn't mentioned because > they haven't been discussed, and they haven't been > discussed because the idea is getting shot down at nearly > every turn. It seems to me that some peoples naive > understanding of what a new NC would be, is a copy and > paste edition of what's already on the net. If it were, > then I 100% agree, it wouldn't be worth paying for. BUT > that notion is very different from what I would envision > it to be. And I wouldn't be wasting my time on a worthless > idea. > > So that might give you a bit of an understanding what's up > my butt and why I'm being a little off-handish. > > BTW: Bakewell's in Derbyshire NOT Yorkshire > > > > Seriously, Pud--what's up yer butt about Rob? The guy > > wasn't that off-base in his comments. Don't go having the > > guy for lunch just because he diplomatically agreed with > > JD? I mean I did the same thing--I understood what she did > > and why and cut her slack even though I would have handled > > it differently. Don't make enemies when it doesn't > > matter--WTF??? What has Rob posted that pissed you off? > > Just curious, because your terse response seemed > > unnecessary, he seemed to be hurt, and I've been > > considering you my favourite poster which pisses me off > > the most if you turn out to be a jerk--a jerk representing > > the Empire!! > > Fly right, Pud--I just want to believe! > > You know they make BLOOD pudding in Yorkshire (brilliant > > place, by the way--one of my very favourites--I was > > married in Bakewell and celebrated with the legendary > > Bakewell Tart! The Minster burned shortly after I returned > > to the states--I also loved the Shambles--what a wonderful > > place!)--don't aim for that namesake source! > > Cheers! > > Leesa > > by the way, Bright Eyes has returned--another 'puter must > > have been found! > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: It's not about paying for RR... - Pudding 02:54 am UTC 09/19/07 |
| Next: | re: It's not about paying for RR... - Rob 12:01 pm UTC 09/19/07 |
| Thread: | |