HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?

Posted by:
daveake 07:24 pm UTC 04/14/08
In reply to: re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - Scaramouche 03:25 pm UTC 04/14/08

If it would have been on Jim's terms - with Jim in charge, using musicians of his choice, insisting on Meat repeating the damn vocals till he gets it right, etc etc., then yes it would have been a top-notch product. Personally I doubt that was the option otherwise surely Jim would have taken the job?

Dave

> Difference is with Bat 3 Jim would have effectively been
> in charge (day to day), and no doubt produced a top-notch
> product (or better than the Bat 3 we did get), whereas
> with DOTV it appears Jim was treated as just the
> 'hired-help', and Sonnenberg & Crawford were the clowns
> running the circus.
>
> > > ... and yet Jim appears to have been the
> > > one to back away?
> >
> > Maybe because, post DotV, Jim had learnt how to avoid a
> > train wreck before it's too late?
> >
> > Dave


reply |

Previous: re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - Scaramouche 03:25 pm UTC 04/14/08
Next: re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - Rob 06:18 pm UTC 04/15/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE