| re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? | |
|
Posted by: |
Scaramouche 03:25 pm UTC 04/14/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - daveake 03:16 pm UTC 04/14/08 |
| Difference is with Bat 3 Jim would have effectively been in charge (day to day), and no doubt produced a top-notch product (or better than the Bat 3 we did get), whereas with DOTV it appears Jim was treated as just the 'hired-help', and Sonnenberg & Crawford were the clowns running the circus. > > ... and yet Jim appears to have been the > > one to back away? > > Maybe because, post DotV, Jim had learnt how to avoid a > train wreck before it's too late? > > Dave | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - daveake 03:16 pm UTC 04/14/08 |
| Next: | re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - daveake 07:24 pm UTC 04/14/08 |
| Thread: |
|