HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?

Posted by:
Scaramouche 03:25 pm UTC 04/14/08
In reply to: re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - daveake 03:16 pm UTC 04/14/08

Difference is with Bat 3 Jim would have effectively been in charge (day to day), and no doubt produced a top-notch product (or better than the Bat 3 we did get), whereas with DOTV it appears Jim was treated as just the 'hired-help', and Sonnenberg & Crawford were the clowns running the circus.

> > ... and yet Jim appears to have been the
> > one to back away?
>
> Maybe because, post DotV, Jim had learnt how to avoid a
> train wreck before it's too late?
>
> Dave


reply |

Previous: re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - daveake 03:16 pm UTC 04/14/08
Next: re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - daveake 07:24 pm UTC 04/14/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE