re: Bat Musical or Film? | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Scaramouche 08:58 pm UTC 07/15/08 |
In reply to: | re: Bat Musical or Film? - Pudding 08:12 pm UTC 07/15/08 |
That comment is what Jim 'thinks', and you can go to film first (Producers, Hairspray, WDTW etc etc); I don't think it really matters? I think I would prefer a stage show first though, as I love the atmosphere/excitement of theatre, and as Jim would probably say 'it's live, it's real, it has a pulse'. Plus (from a selfish point of view), I think they could put on a stage show quicker than a film. If they can get it ready in time, anyone think they will go head-to-head with 'Phantom 2' in late Autumn 2009, or will they delay into 2010 (as the Mark Dendy article says)? > The way I read JD's comments was, stage can go to film but > film can't go to stage. If the Bat musical went to film > first then it would be difficult for it to go to stage > afterwards, however if it went to stage first then making > a fikm afterwards wouldn't be a problem. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Bat Musical or Film? - Pudding 08:12 pm UTC 07/15/08 |
Next: | re: Bat Musical or Film? - Pudding 09:50 pm UTC 07/15/08 |
Thread: |
|