HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Bat Musical or Film?

Posted by:
Scaramouche 08:58 pm UTC 07/15/08
In reply to: re: Bat Musical or Film? - Pudding 08:12 pm UTC 07/15/08

That comment is what Jim 'thinks', and you can go to film first (Producers, Hairspray, WDTW etc etc); I don't think it really matters?

I think I would prefer a stage show first though, as I love the atmosphere/excitement of theatre, and as Jim would probably say 'it's live, it's real, it has a pulse'.

Plus (from a selfish point of view), I think they could put on a stage show quicker than a film.

If they can get it ready in time, anyone think they will go head-to-head with 'Phantom 2' in late Autumn 2009, or will they delay into 2010 (as the Mark Dendy article says)?


> The way I read JD's comments was, stage can go to film but
> film can't go to stage. If the Bat musical went to film
> first then it would be difficult for it to go to stage
> afterwards, however if it went to stage first then making
> a fikm afterwards wouldn't be a problem.


reply |

Previous: re: Bat Musical or Film? - Pudding 08:12 pm UTC 07/15/08
Next: re: Bat Musical or Film? - Pudding 09:50 pm UTC 07/15/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE