re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Scaramouche 12:49 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
In reply to: | Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Macahan 07:41 am UTC 08/17/08 |
Meat seems to be going through the motions on this tour, and I would suggest not giving value for money, what with the vocal problems, PA problems & fucking with the melodies. I don't know why he's still doing long tours? He's either got money problems (which I doubt), or he still loves 'performing'? However, from the look of him on stage (in lots of venues) he surely 'aint enjoying it? The one-off show at RAH in 2006 was actually quite good, and I thought that was the start of him 'scaling down' the number of live shows he does, by doing more special one-off 'events'. If he does do another tour he needs to: 1. Do fewer shows to protect his vocals. 2. Do smaller venues for a change (ie rock clubs, theatres), making each show more intimate (a packed club of say 1000 is a far better live experience than a half empty arena). 3. Radically alter his set-list, as it has become sooooo boring. I know people here think his vocals are shot, but I still would like to see him contribute to a Bat musical 'concept' album (some of his Bat 3 studio vocals are pretty decent?). > I'm not that much into the legal of songwriting, but isn't > it true that you can perform a persons song without > permission if they're published, but if you alter them you > should ask permission ? What I heard last night was NOT > Jim's songs and he should get an injunction that prohibits > Meat from performing them in public ever again. Even if he > doensn't win it would make great headlines and everyone > who attened this last tour will nod their head and think > "way to go,Jim". | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - AndrewG 03:51 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Next: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 01:03 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Thread: |
|