HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again)

Posted by:
Smeghead 10:39 pm UTC 08/17/08
In reply to: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Pudding 09:37 pm UTC 08/17/08


To see him do what?
> > The fact that he continues to tour, with diminishing vocal
> > returns, at more & more shows, means he's 'taking the
> > piss' to a certain extent, and not giving value for
> > money.
>
> Value for money...hmmm...now there's an interesting
> thought. Who can say what is or isn't value for money?
>
> How much would you be willing to pay to see Meat Loaf?


reply |

Previous: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 11:34 am UTC 08/22/08
Next: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Pudding 04:42 am UTC 08/18/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE