re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Smeghead 06:50 pm UTC 08/29/08 |
In reply to: | re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers - Rob 06:22 pm UTC 08/29/08 |
Just because Jim chose to call it Bat Out Of Hell does not mean he has to involve Loaf in some way. All he has to do is every time the stupid press asks where Meat is or who is playing Meat or whatever dumb ass question they ask he says "The musical has nothing to do with Meat Loaf. The musical is based on the Peter Pan legend, only the Lost Boys are eternal Teenagers, not children. The Musical in its original form was written prior to Meat Loaf recording Bat Out Of Hell. Meat did not appear in the original musical and he does not appear in this re-imagined version either. I wish him all the best with his current album and tour." > > > Unfortunately Jim is afraid the show won't > > sail on its own merrits. > > You've answered your own question there. > > Jim decided to call the musical Bat out of Hell to ride on > the back of that album's name and its success. That's why > he now has to deal with the Meat Loaf problem and involve > him in some way. He set the expectations, not the press or > any of us on this board. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers - Rob 06:22 pm UTC 08/29/08 |
Next: | re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers - Pudding 12:42 am UTC 09/01/08 |
Thread: |
|