| A Tale Of Two Thugs | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 11:47 pm UTC 04/20/09 |
| Dear Pudding You wrote: "When most people think of a window-licker, head-nodder,dribble-monkey, retard etc etc etc for better or worse they usually think of someone with downs." Oh my goodness. You really are stupid. Why else would you use descriptions like "dribble-monkey"? How foul is that? I can just see you having a giggle and thinking that you're really funny. Some posts that were made a long time ago made you and Smeg upset and jealous and since then you have both come out with all sorts of obscene rubbish to attack me with. I would much rather talk to a guy with Downs Syndrome than talk to an idiot like Smeg who keeps saying "you lying cunt" over and over again. Smeg saying that he has a crippled friend who doesn't mind having the piss taken out of him shows how thick he can be. Using Downs Syndrome to insult someone is very different and just horrible. I was very glad when Rob wrote: "Comparing someone to a downs syndrome sufferer on a public forum is completely different. You're making a very simple connection - downs syndrome = dumb, thick, stupid. Something to sneer at. It always smuses me how the people who bleat that they are being "anti-PC" actually just use it to justify being rude, abusive or bigoted. Being anti-PC is railing against stupidty like calling a blackboard a chalkboard. Trying to insult someone by comparing them to someone who is mentally and physically disabled is just behaving like a bigoted oaf." Also, Lotus NZ had a point when he posted: "one would hope your children would never be born with downs, you fucking wanker..." I can understand why Susan was driven potty by the pair of you. She said she was desended from Russian and Austrian nobility and you and Smeg ganged up to push her around and bully her. Even if she had been able to offer proof, you would have still been jealous and you would have still tried to chase her off the board. Now that she is gone, you have decided to make me your target. You say that my posts are so immature that I must either be 15 or retarded. Well, a lot of 15 year olds could write an interesting post and one of the readers at church is retarded and he is a better person than me or you. Smeg wrote (about me): "Yes, by special I asked if you were retarded, a window Licker, an unsavory, someone with a touch of the downs... If not then I assume by your writings that you are 15 because of the lack of maturity with which you write. So how old are you?" I am 45 and I have a first class degree from the University Of London. It seems to be only you and Smeg who find my posts to be so immature that I must be retarded (not that there would be anything wrong with that - its just not true). Jim likes things that I write but you two thugs make it sound like I can't even write a simple paragraph. You probably think that I can't tie my shoelaces or go to the toilet without help. I exchanged friendly posts with Marvello (for example) and Smeg said I was being a troll. I have asked many times if you could explain your attacks on me. But you just keep saying that my writing is immature. Is it that you can't understand what I am trying to say? Is that why you dismiss me as immature? If I could remind you of what Klasien wrote: "This post is not so much for Steven as it is for those hitting him over the head for every move he makes. You guys are a bunch of hypocritical cunts and I am not afraid to say so. Porkington gets mentioned here every once in a while, and you all make sure he gets seen in the worst light possible. I have no love for the guy, having received my share of his hatemail for being a member here, but seriously... You follow his every move, critisize every move he makes and bash him at every chance you get, while making sure everyone is aware of all he does. That's all fair and nice, but the moment someone else posts about him, it's all spamming and bullshit... What the hell makes you guys so great?? Why is it that you can post whatever the fuck you want and proclaim any shit you feel like, yet when others do it it is suddenly a disaster and they need to be banned?" As far as I can see, there are only two hypocrits on the board. You and Smeg. You both flame and spam but as soon as someone else comes even close to doing that the pair of you are the first to complain. Marvello was right to point out that you hyjacked a thread the other day, going on about nutters (you were meaning me). He said you couldn't resist it. Yet I have seen old posts where you get very cross at Susan for doing the same thing. I would like to make peace with both you and Smeg. But its not going to be easy. The two of you seem to think that the board belongs to you. And I have become your target. In the last few minutes, Smeg has written to Rob saying: "In other words... get a sense of humor." Smeg is so thick that he keeps missing Rob's point. He's comparing making fun of a Downs Syndrome child to Mel Brooks' Springtime For Hitler. Rob should probably give up. And Smeg thinks I am either retarded and immature. What on earth does he think he is? And you, his loyal little helper. That's all for now. Steven Stuart | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: NJC: Freedom - Financial opportunity or reduced responsibility? - JimmyG 02:47 pm UTC 04/22/09 |
| Next: | re: A Tale Of Two Thugs - daveake 09:10 am UTC 04/21/09 |
| Thread: |
|