re: Bat out of Hell 3 - a year on since i played it | |
Posted by: |
BULLWHIP 10:15 pm UTC 04/26/09 |
In reply to: | Bat out of Hell 3 - a year on since i played it - Rupert 06:25 pm UTC 04/26/09 |
> I listened to this album for a first time for a while and > although I thought it was Ok when it came out, it is > pretty hard going getting to the end of it now. It is like > it is on speed the whole way through apart from the end > song. No wonder Meat's voice failed him afterwards! The > pacing is way off and even some obvious Steinman tricks > missed. An example would be Blind as a Bat, the lyric > could do with a female answer at the end of it to set it > off. The album is far too long. I would be interested to > hear what it would be like if it was just 9 tracks and in > what order? Also if Bat out of Hell 3 was just Jim's songs > old and new what should they be if you limited it down to > 9 or 10 songs? The only songs that should have been used would be the following: BRAVER THAN WE ARE BAD FOR GOOD with a totally different arrangement than what Meat used. SEIZE THE NIGHT LAND OF THE PIG CRY TO HEAVEN THE FUTURE AIN'T WHAT IT USED TO BE no duet here IF IT AIN'T BROKE WHAT PART OF MY BODY HURTS THE MOST if Jim allowed it ONLY WHEN I FEEL DATE WITH DESTINY BLIND AS A BAT | |
reply | | |
Previous: | Bat out of Hell 3 - a year on since i played it - Rupert 06:25 pm UTC 04/26/09 |
Next: | re: Bat out of Hell 3 - a year on since i played it - batoutofhell77 04:29 am UTC 04/27/09 |
Thread: |
|