| re: Free the man | |
|
Posted by: |
Pudding 04:23 am UTC 10/01/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Free the man - Smeghead 02:23 am UTC 10/01/09 |
| Was it established if the girl was a virgin or not before Polanski did her? > Statutory rape of a girl he plied with drugs and alcohol > who claimed she was scared of him so she didn't fight > back. Besides, 13 is 13... If a 44 year old screwed one > of my daughters he'd be very dead. > > > > Polanski is a rapist. He was found guilty of rape by a > > > court, but paedophile and coward are probably > > > inaccurate,as who wouldn't run away if they thought they > > > were going to go to prison but knew they had a chance to > > > avoid it. > > > > I thought Polanski was done for statutory rape not actual > > rape, there is a difference. Also I believe Polanski had > > already admitted to the charge and to the sentencing but > > the prosecutor and judge changed their mind at the last > > minute which resulted in Polanski fleeing the country. > > > > But at the end of the day it all falls back on the victim, > > what does she want to do? Now she's a fully grown woman > > with kids on her own it seems she wants to put the whole > > ordeal behind her, but can't. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Free the man - Smeghead 02:23 am UTC 10/01/09 |
| Next: | re: Free the man - Smeghead 10:44 am UTC 10/01/09 |
| Thread: |
|