| re: Free the man | |
|
Posted by: |
Smeghead 02:23 am UTC 10/01/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Free the man - Pudding 10:39 pm UTC 09/30/09 |
| Statutory rape of a girl he plied with drugs and alcohol who claimed she was scared of him so she didn't fight back. Besides, 13 is 13... If a 44 year old screwed one of my daughters he'd be very dead. > > Polanski is a rapist. He was found guilty of rape by a > > court, but paedophile and coward are probably > > inaccurate,as who wouldn't run away if they thought they > > were going to go to prison but knew they had a chance to > > avoid it. > > I thought Polanski was done for statutory rape not actual > rape, there is a difference. Also I believe Polanski had > already admitted to the charge and to the sentencing but > the prosecutor and judge changed their mind at the last > minute which resulted in Polanski fleeing the country. > > But at the end of the day it all falls back on the victim, > what does she want to do? Now she's a fully grown woman > with kids on her own it seems she wants to put the whole > ordeal behind her, but can't. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Free the man - Pudding 10:39 pm UTC 09/30/09 |
| Next: | re: Free the man - Pudding 04:23 am UTC 10/01/09 |
| Thread: |
|