| re: Reply to question asked in 'Dead Ringer' thread | |
|
Posted by: |
Vin 02:06 pm UTC 01/08/10 |
| In reply to: | re: Reply to question asked in 'Dead Ringer' thread - Jaycee 07:42 am UTC 01/08/10 |
| Very interesting read. I didn't understand half of the technical jargon, but I get the gist that it was an arduous, tedious pain in the ass to make Jim's vision a reality. Also interesting to realize the extent to which Thoener was a creative input on the final product. Thanks for sharing. > > That was interesting to read. Thank you very much! That > > explains why people hear something new in most of Jimīs > > songs now and then. > > That is so true... > I listened to IDAFL in excess of 12 times a day for 6 > weeks putting this analysis together, and every time I > thought 'Oh there's something I didn't hear before, did I > mention that'. > The damn assignment ended up being 48 pages long in the > end, and I refused to listen to IDAFL for about 6 months > after I had finished, just incase I had found something > else....lol > > David's input was tramendous and it gave me a greater > appreciation for the album, once I realised how much more > effort had to be put in to it to get it to sound the way > it did. > He also left me with some very good sound mixing tips and > advice that I tried to encorporate into the rest of my > studies and my practical time in the school studios. > I now have a few of his mixes that I use as reference > pieces when ever I do any mixing or set up a live room. > > Yeah and 'Smooth' is one of my favourite tracks...lol | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Reply to question asked in 'Dead Ringer' thread - Jaycee 07:42 am UTC 01/08/10 |
| Next: | re: Reply to question asked in 'Dead Ringer' thread - steven_stuart 07:10 pm UTC 01/09/10 |
| Thread: |
|