| re: Should Meat Loaf Be Cast As Hook? |
|
Posted by:
 |
Rupert 05:20 pm UTC 02/05/10 |
| In reply to: |
re: Should Meat Loaf Be Cast As Hook? - John_Galt 02:08 am UTC 02/05/10 |
|
Smeg wrote a treatment of a Bat Musical with Neverland in mind so unfortunately this Chinese whispers game that gets played out on this forum could be cleared up straight away by someone official from the show other than the non paid Stuart. It makes me feel that someone is either not very confident in the storyline or the poster that was released into the press gives us a better clue. Peter Pan and the Poster don't really tie up do they or am I missing the Peter Pan point?
> If I remember Smeg was pretty close to certain that the
> intent behind the musical was to complete the Neverland
> project. I never saw the evidence, but Smeg's usually
> correct about this stuff. Perhaps the amount of recycling
> used in recent years had driven him to the point where he
> couldn't even see the possibility that Jim would do
> anything more than simply recycle the Neverland concept in
> its entirety if given the chance.
>
> -=John Galt=-
>
> > Is it even confirmed that Hook is in the musical? I mean,
> > do we expect that its exactly "Neverland?"
> >
> > > Jim's not gonna cast Meat and Meat wouldn't do it, so it's
> > > a pretty academic question.
> > >
> > > If it were a non-singing (or virtually non-singing) role
> > > where Meat could just act the hard man, then it might work
> > > for opening night and the ocasaional guest appearance, but
> > > let's face facts - it ain't gonna happen.
> > >
> > > Or do you know something we don't Stuart?
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
Jim's Neverland Is Different Than J.M. Barrie's Neverland - steven_stuart 12:20 am UTC 02/07/10 |
| Next: |
Chinese Whispers - steven_stuart 01:02 am UTC 02/07/10 |
|
| Thread: |
|