| re: Should Meat Loaf Be Cast As Hook? | |
|
Posted by: |
John_Galt 02:08 am UTC 02/05/10 |
| In reply to: | re: Should Meat Loaf Be Cast As Hook? - Vin 02:03 am UTC 02/05/10 |
| If I remember Smeg was pretty close to certain that the intent behind the musical was to complete the Neverland project. I never saw the evidence, but Smeg's usually correct about this stuff. Perhaps the amount of recycling used in recent years had driven him to the point where he couldn't even see the possibility that Jim would do anything more than simply recycle the Neverland concept in its entirety if given the chance. -=John Galt=- > Is it even confirmed that Hook is in the musical? I mean, > do we expect that its exactly "Neverland?" > > > Jim's not gonna cast Meat and Meat wouldn't do it, so it's > > a pretty academic question. > > > > If it were a non-singing (or virtually non-singing) role > > where Meat could just act the hard man, then it might work > > for opening night and the ocasaional guest appearance, but > > let's face facts - it ain't gonna happen. > > > > Or do you know something we don't Stuart? | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Should Meat Loaf Be Cast As Hook? - steven_stuart 01:22 am UTC 02/07/10 |
| Next: | Jim's Neverland Is Different Than J.M. Barrie's Neverland - steven_stuart 12:20 am UTC 02/07/10 |
| Thread: |
|