| re: The Emperor's New Clothes | |
|
Posted by: |
crazy_janey 12:37 am UTC 02/16/10 |
| In reply to: | re: The Emperor's New Clothes - Rob 12:22 pm UTC 02/14/10 |
| > Actually Meat's voice was OK in this performance. How do > you expect a man in his sixties to sound? Listen to > Springsteen at Glastonbury if you want to hear a really > bad (and I mean flat as fuck!) performance. > Not a fair comparison, IMO...you're citing one of Springsteen's "off" performances to make your point. Granted, Bruce had some rough patches this past tour in regards his voice, but in general, he still sounds loads better than Meat. (Apologies to Meat...)In fact, in some ways, I think that Bruce is a better singer now than years ago, in the sense that he has learned how to use his voice better. I thought the Popstar performance was just OK- not bad, but not what I expected considering how folks were raving about it on mlukfc. I actually liked the musical arrangement, though. I also agree with the poster who said that For Crying Out Loud would have been a better choice; I was thinking the same thing. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: The Emperor's New Clothes - Rob 12:22 pm UTC 02/14/10 |
| Next: | re: The Emperor's New Clothes - Rob 07:56 pm UTC 02/16/10 |
| Thread: |
|