HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: The Emperor's New Clothes

Posted by:
Rob 12:22 pm UTC 02/14/10
In reply to: The Emperor's New Clothes - Steven 08:52 am UTC 02/14/10

LOL - superb rant!

Actually Meat's voice was OK in this performance. How do you expect a man in his sixties to sound? Listen to Springsteen at Glastonbury if you want to hear a really bad (and I mean flat as fuck!) performance.

On the whole, older singers live off their past reputations rather than anything they do nowadays (Stevie Wonder hasn't made a decent album since the 1970s ffs), and as long as people still want to hear them sing, then what's the problem with it?

>
> If you want my honest thoughts:
> I for one are surprised every time Meat Loaf is allowed to
> open his mouth somewhere. I just don't get it. I just
> don't get for how long he has already been able to make
> this work.
> Is anyone actually listening? He can't sing, he simply
> cannot sing! Yet he is surrounded by fine musicians, he is
> allowed to "sing" publicly -- ironically even on shows who
> concentrate on judging other people's singing abilities(!)
> -- he is allowed to make records, again and again and
> again.
> Anyone with a bit of a musical sense must recognize how
> bad he is. Sometimes you see people feeling embarassed who
> have to present him on shows etc., yet no one says
> anything, yet everyone pretends it wasn't so, yet he's
> still allowed to make recordings, concerts, appear on TV
> shows etc. Why? How does he make it work? Far better
> people get kicked for much smaller reasons all the time!
>
> I would so like to know what all these musicians
> are *honestly* thinking who [have to] work with him at one
> occasion or another. For example the orchestra guys on
> that "opera star" TV show. Or the lady, Juliette Pochin.
> Or the guys who keep on making records with Meat Loaf or
> going on tour with him. They know about it. Sometimes you
> can see it in their faces. Yet everyone pretends it wasn't
> so.
>
> Why?
> Why, why, why?
>
> It's like The Emperor's New Clothes. Only Meat Loaf isn't
> an emperor, so unlike in the story, there isn't even a
> serious reason for people to pretend they wouldn't see how
> bad and embarassing he is.
>
> I just don't understand it.
>
> And I feel sorry for Jim that his name still gets attached
> to this embarassing guy all the time.
>
>
>


reply |

Previous: re: The Emperor's New Clothes - LordRahl 03:52 pm UTC 02/14/10
Next: re: The Emperor's New Clothes - crazy_janey 12:37 am UTC 02/16/10

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE