| re: The Three Bats Out Of Hell | |
|
Posted by: |
Vin 01:27 am UTC 10/15/10 |
| In reply to: | The Three Bats Out Of Hell - steven_stuart 11:24 pm UTC 10/14/10 |
| Call me crazy, but.... I've always assumed the Bat I bat is just a statue in the graveyard, as opposed to an actual, live Bat. But now, for the first-time, I'm looking at it as though its a live, giant Bat sitting on top of a church. Good God. Which is it??? Have I been missing the point all these years?? And Bat I IS my fave Bat cover by far, too! > Vin, you may well have a point when you write: "As for the > monster-bat, that started w/ Bat II, which presumably had > Jim's approval." However, if you look at just the cover > artwork, the Bat 3 bat looks much more fierce than the > first two bats. Which of the three bats do posters prefer? > I personally like the Bat 2 bat because he is sitting on > top of the Chrysler Building and the scene around it looks > like post-apocalyptic New York, which fits in with > Obsidian in the "Neverland" ("BOOH The Musical) story. It > really is a huge bat though. Wow. You could call it a > monster (the King Kong of bats) but the Bat 3 bat is more > ferocious. > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | The Three Bats Out Of Hell - steven_stuart 11:24 pm UTC 10/14/10 |
| Next: | re: The Three Bats Out Of Hell - steven_stuart 03:57 pm UTC 10/17/10 |
| Thread: |
|