| re: BTW | |
|
Posted by: |
crazy_janey 01:43 pm UTC 12/12/10 |
| In reply to: | re: BTW - Marvello 12:26 pm UTC 12/12/10 |
| He's much more than "passable", IMO. It changes from show to show, and sometimes even within a given show. Was he as good this tour as even on the Magic tour? No, probably not. But Hyde Park is not a good example, because from what I heard (live and boots), on the whole, he sounded much better than that show. And, I don't know if that's what Andrew was intending by his post, but you really can't compare the changes in Bruce's voice to the change in Meat's- it's not even close, and you have no idea how it pains me to say so. I happen to like the way Bruce sounds now- I still enjoy listening to him. I can't even watch some of those YouTubes of Meat all the way to the end. (And don't tell me it's beacause the sound is bad on the YouTubes) > C'mon Janey be honest he never sounds excellent nowadays, > passable maybe but excellent LMAO > > > > I noticed some vocal problems of Bruce Springsteen last > > > year at Hyde Park too and that is the first time I heard > > > that at his shows. > > > > He had laryngitis at Hyde Park- one reason I was surprised > > they chose that show for the DVD. He was sick before he > > went to Europe last Summer, and it took him a while to > > shake it. That, and he had the Glastonbury show the night > > before Hyde. > > > > I saw him at the end of the tour, and he sounded just > > fine, if not excellent. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: BTW - Marvello 12:26 pm UTC 12/12/10 |
| Next: | re: BTW - Croftie 04:49 pm UTC 12/12/10 |
| Thread: |
|