New Game! It's called Naivety or Maliciousness. Simple premise: take something that has been said in the past about something subsequently disproven, and pontificate over whether the person who said it was simply being Naive, or Malicious.
Adding to the fun is that we invariably only ever know one side of the story, making any and all of our responses potential future subject of the great game of Naivety or Maliciousness. Lol.
We'll start with Meat, cause he is the obvious and easy target.
On MLFUCK, 09 Jul 2010, 18:05, Meat said re: TMiL:
I was hoping Jim would come on board and help finish the record. with a couple of different songs. Get rid of Monster and a couple of others. The lyrics on monster are just not well structured.
So lemme get this right… Meat was hoping that Jim, whom he had just finished suing and taking IP from, would come in and salvage the already well-advanced body of songs written and/or arranged by Desmond Child, in some bid to protect the very IP that Meat had just taken from him for the purposes of the album Desmond CHild was now making.
Hmm…
I'm gonna give Meat the benefit of the doubt here and say that, somehow, he actually DID think that Jim would be willing to come in somewhere along the line and help fix his and Desmond's trainwreck of an album that shits all over his own legacy. I'll go with Naive.
|
