| re: IT'S CALLED A FUCKING INTERPRETATION | |
|
Posted by: |
Pudding 08:30 am UTC 03/28/07 |
| In reply to: | re: IT'S CALLED A FUCKING INTERPRETATION - rockfenris2005 08:10 am UTC 03/28/07 |
| > Exactly. I respect Jim's vision but I'm allowed to have an > interpretation and it shouldn't piss anyone off to talk > about it. You're right it shouldn't, but when your interpretation seems a little 'out there' in every sense, then you got to appreciate some people are going to question it in one way or another. Faster in Rhinegold...c'mon that's like saying Bat Out Of Hell would fit in Annie. Pud | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: IT'S CALLED A FUCKING INTERPRETATION - rockfenris2005 08:10 am UTC 03/28/07 |
| Next: | re: IT'S CALLED A FUCKING INTERPRETATION - pidunk 05:19 pm UTC 03/28/07 |
| Thread: |
|