HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: The Anatomy Of Research, Or, Why Not Just Doodle?

Posted by:
pidunk 11:49 pm UTC 05/25/07
In reply to: re: The Anatomy Of Research, Or, Why Not Just Doodle? - Jacob 08:09 pm UTC 05/25/07



> From Jim's blog:
>
> "Please try & enjoy. BTW, re comments on my singing in
> JOKER, that , and this, are done in my REAL & NATURAL
> range, baritone. I HAD to sing a full octave higher on BAD
> FOR GOOD cause trax were cut for Meat Loaf. This is my
> "natural habitat" for song."
>
> I'm by far no expert on singing, but the vocals on "Surf's
> Up", "Lost Boys" and "Rock And Roll Dreams" are obviously
> higher than on the rest of all the other songs on the
> album. Would it really be possible for Jim to go two
> octaves higher than he usually sings him? I know my friend
> always whines about how she has enough trouble singing one
> octave higher than "her natual voice".
>
> About Rory Dodd, do you also believe that Jim is the
> singer on the demo of "A Kiss Is A Terrible Thing To
> Waste" at Smeghead's site?
>
>
Jim is absolutely the singer of that demo. And you did not read my long winded post about the constructs of vocals and what professional singers are capable of. If you know a professional singer who is trained to the extent that Jim is trained, this debate would be non-existent because it is a no-brainer in that area. So, find the post that I wrote, read it, and then reply to it. This forum has text search capability.






reply |

Previous: re: The Anatomy Of Research, Or, Why Not Just Doodle? - Jacob 08:09 pm UTC 05/25/07
Next: re: The Anatomy Of Research, Or, Why Not Just Doodle? - samurai7 05:26 pm UTC 05/26/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE