Right I was trying to amke peace then. I did not at one point try to affend you in thr pervious post. Sorry if you thihnk that I did but it was was not my intention. But oncve mpre you have discredited my opinion. And I will choose tp persove spngs the way I want them to. Not the way you want me to.
>
>
> > Not wanting to stir things again. Bit I read all I can in
> > that song. Mayber it differs from your perception of the
> > song. But its my opinion. So please to not just mereley
> > discredit it.
>
>
> I am not discrediting your perception of the song.
> However, you can't tell John Denver that he didn't write
> Annie's Song for Annie. Yet married couples worldwide
> dedicate that song to each other in bliss and joy within
> their own unique loves. Have your meaning, and let me have
> mine.
>
>
>
>
> >But you are right. I do find I can relate
> > that song to a past situation. Despite not believing you.
>
> I give you only logical constructs. You say, gee your
> logic was right, but I don't believe you. One does not
> have anything to do with another. There is only one
> purpose served by repeating constantly that I am not to be
> believed, and that has an agenda, and all agendas are
> political.
>
>
>
>
>
> > BEcause I go with established fact.
>
>
> You do not know established fact. You are nowhere where
> you can know any established fact. It does not matter how
> much you read if you misinterpret what you read, and it
> does not matter how much of falsehoods you read if you
> think false is fact. If you go with established fact,
> sometime you wanted to know fact, or some connection
> between you and the established fiction exists. I have no
> time for you.
>
|
