not logged in
| re: Jacqueline... | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 08:49 pm UTC 08/21/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Jacqueline... - Pudding 08:38 pm UTC 08/21/07 |
>But > the fact you've tried to make that connection proves what > a moron you are, quite sad really, as you don't have an S > or an N in your first name and I don't think you're from > America. It is really rarely noticed that the name "Susan" is USA with an S at the beginning and an N at the end of it. I was born in the United States, indeed, but why the name was chosen had nothing to do with a family name being carried forward in memoriam, or something that was said in the book, and further, a middle name was added, which highlighted another designate of the Great America, but with respect to the grandfather, so to speak, by virtue of my mother's first husband's father who died during the pregnancy. His name was Sam, and my mother's explanation for the combination of both first and middle name was that the first initial of the first name would tie in with the second two letters of my middle name, so that I would represent "SAM", and we all here know who the symbolic "Uncle Sam" is. My mother apparently intended for me to represent the United States in some symbolic fashion, and it is a country which has other than neutral interests to her as a resident. But that is another story altogether. I seem to be quite the focus of others as though I am more a country than a person, however, oddly enough, and the country that I am more in legacy in representative of is not the USA, but Empirical Russia, and Germany, where there are not any active monarchies. Where there are, is of course The United Kingdom and Denmark, as well, and if one REALLY wants to delve, the second (Christian) Roman Empire. In the USA, I happily live as a citizen and defend the constitution. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jacqueline... - Pudding 02:17 am UTC 08/22/07 |
| Next: | re: Jacqueline... - Bright_Eyes 09:41 am UTC 08/22/07 |
| Thread: |
|