| re: Jim's Blog | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 06:15 am UTC 09/06/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim's Blog - Smeghead 01:30 am UTC 09/06/07 |
I am not Bright_Eyes and Bright_Eyes is not me. Just because someone highly intelligent and SANE comes along, does not make them ME. I'm not the only sane person here :) > Figures... the first reply is Susan's alter ego. Why is > JD so stubborn to allow this bitch to ruin the board...? > > > > I hope Bat works out for Jim. > > > > That is, if the "BAT musical" even exists. Face it. > > Steinman has been hyping that thing for over 14 months > > now, and there is still no tangible evidence that it even > > exists. Conspiracy? > > > > > As for Family guy. > > > > I don't have a television anymore I don't watch anything. > > > > > As for Politics... > > > > I don't vote, I just follow political news around the > > world and form opinions, but then I don't actually vote, > > join anything or support anything. > > > > If Steinman's precious candidate Kucinich is nominated, I > > think that's the only way a U.S.A. Republican could win. > > Steinman's vote for Kucinich is a vote for the GOP. > > > > > > Kucinich is so far to the left/hysterical that > > moderate/mainstream Democrats and swing voters will flee > > to Giuliani or McCain or pretty much any Republican. > > > > If Steinman wants the GOP candidate to not win he should > > support a Democrat who has a chance, probably Hillary > > Clinton, despite his hatred of her. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim's Blog - Smeghead 03:51 pm UTC 09/08/07 |
| Next: | re: Jim's Blog - Smeghead 06:21 pm UTC 09/06/07 |
| Thread: |
|