| re: Confusion about the new interview | |
|
Posted by: |
HellsFinest 06:37 pm UTC 10/01/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Confusion about the new interview - bobsaget 04:32 pm UTC 10/01/07 |
| The original 'Bat out of Hell' is the legacy... all other sequels are very interesting, and great albums... (yes, even the Monster...) and have moments that will be included in the hearts of Meat and Steinman fans all around (Anything for Love, Objects, Land of the Pig, Blind as a Bat etc.) Both Steinman and Meat have conceded this, i think... and hence are still trying to make the most of their original Bat legacy, seperatly... Meat, doing his Meat thing, and Steinman doing the musical... and more power to them both... since they are too stubborn, childish, nervous, scared, un-patient, etc, to work with each other, at least they still make 'Bat out of Hell' out to be their lasting piece of EPICNESS.... it's like 2 parents who have long divorced, and yet are still so proud of their child and the adult the child has become.... > I guess all that we can hope for is the alleged > conclusions and climaxes and hope that there can be some > sort of legitimate ending between the two. > > > > It's just always upset me that Meat would threaten to take > > > Jim to court over whether or not he could call the album > > > Bat III, then have the audacity to dedicate the album to > > > him! It makes no logical sense. > > > > It does when you're trying to market and sell the album, > > which at the end of the day, is all that Bat Out Of Hell > > meant to Meat, a means to an end and not a lasting Bat > > legacy. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Confusion about the new interview - bobsaget 04:32 pm UTC 10/01/07 |
| Next: | re: Confusion about the new interview - Tremorlor 04:54 am UTC 10/02/07 |
| Thread: |
|