HOME
|
MAIN BOARD
|
TWITTER
|
LOGIN
|
REGISTER
|
SEARCH
|
FLAT MODE
not logged in
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?
Posted by:
daveake
03:16 pm UTC 04/14/08
In reply to:
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?
-
Scaramouche
03:03 pm UTC 04/14/08
> ... and yet Jim appears to have been the
> one to back away?
Maybe because, post DotV, Jim had learnt how to avoid a train wreck before it's too late?
Dave
reply
|
Previous:
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?
-
Scaramouche
03:03 pm UTC 04/14/08
Next:
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?
-
Scaramouche
03:25 pm UTC 04/14/08
Thread:
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?
-
Scaramouche
03:25 pm UTC 04/14/08
(5)
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?
-
daveake
07:24 pm UTC 04/14/08
(4)
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?
-
Rob
06:18 pm UTC 04/15/08
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?
-
Evil_One
08:11 pm UTC 04/14/08
(2)
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?
-
Pudding
07:38 am UTC 04/15/08
(1)
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3?
-
Smeghead
11:44 am UTC 04/15/08
HOME
|
MAIN BOARD
|
LOG OFF
|
START A NEW THREAD
|
EDIT PROFILE
|
SEARCH
|
FLAT MODE