| re: What I MEANT to say was... | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 09:16 am UTC 06/15/08 |
| In reply to: | What I MEANT to say was... - Wilbury 08:38 am UTC 06/15/08 |
When I mentioned the record deal that Jim was offered, that happened before TMIL and any of that period. That was when Meat still wanted to record "Final at Bat". If that's what you're asking? As for Jim getting that money out of court, I doubt it. If I was in his shoes, I wouldn't want that money. I'd rather get my money's worth on my epic rock spectacular. > > That is exactly my point. Nobody knows. > > Why then is everyone assuming that the settlement consists > of that which they have heard, and nothing else!? > > Are we really so naïve as to think that Jim's lawyers > settled out of court for "We get to use your trademark and > you're not allowed to comment on it publicly, then you get > to go back to using it as normal" ?? All just to avoid > another lawsuit? Methinks Meat had a poop-load more to > lose than Jim. > > > > > > > > All we know is that they reached an agreement. The > > > contents of that agreement won't be known until long after > > > their deaths. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | What I MEANT to say was... - Wilbury 08:38 am UTC 06/15/08 |
| Next: | re: What I MEANT to say was... - Wilbury 09:22 am UTC 06/15/08 |
| Thread: |
|