HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Plus

Posted by:
Pudding 08:32 pm UTC 04/11/09
In reply to: re: Plus - Steven 08:20 pm UTC 04/11/09

> If Jim compromises too much and attaches himself/his name
> to "bad or mediocre things that suck up to potential
> buyers" people will remember him for and associate him
> with "bad or mediocre things that suck up to potential
> buyers". And that will also be the stuff that people,
> including future clients and sponsors, will expect from
> him.

Too late...DOTV and Bat3

I've got more cover versions of Jims songs than I can shake a big stick at and usually the ones that I listen to are the ones that have done fairly well in the charts or been re-done by Jim (Original Sin by Taylor Dayne, Making Love by Bonnie Tyler, IACBTMN by Celine Dion etc)

Jim isn't a young man anymore, he's got few opportunities to actually get some more of his music out there. If he's behind the wheel of giving an established artist a song of his then I'm all for it. Cos sure as bears shit in the woods he's got next to fuck all chance of making it in the charts with a complete unknown.


reply |

Previous: re: Plus - Steven 08:20 pm UTC 04/11/09
Next: re: Plus - Rob 11:17 pm UTC 04/11/09

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE