not logged in
| re: RIP Michael Jackson | |
Posted by:  |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 09:54 pm UTC 06/28/09 |
| In reply to: | re: RIP Michael Jackson - Pudding 08:52 pm UTC 06/28/09 |
| Explain your logic in saying that you moron. I just don't think hes a child molester. And wasn't it you who thought Polanski should have been let off for his statutory rape charge. If anyone cons one child molestation it you sir. > Seems you condone child molestation you sick fuck. > > > Who's to say that he wasn't being blackmailed . Just > > because they went public doesn't mean blackmail wasn't > > their intention, his reputation was falling apart and so > > he got rid of the problem. sounds like Blackmail to me. > > They probably went public with their bull shit so they > > would get paid off. Oh I was referring to pudding not you > > about the whole able so support their family thing. I was > > insinuating Pudding was your wife....lol > > > > > > > Funny how you didn't address my theory of him being > > > > blackmailed > > > > > > What's to address? It is an asinine theory. If you are > > > being blackmailed with something that isn't true then it > > > isn't done in public. For him to pay off someone who was > > > publicly accusing him is the same as admitting he did it. > > > He wasn't protecting his name. Your theory falls apart. > > > > > > > > > > > > I recall reading once that you dont provide > > > > for your family. What great role model for your children, > > > > Its a safe bet they'll grow up resening you and your wife > > > > smeghead. > > > > > > And where did you read that? I support my family (along > > > with my wife who works)... > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: RIP Michael Jackson - Pudding 08:52 pm UTC 06/28/09 |
| Next: | re: RIP Michael Jackson - Pudding 10:41 pm UTC 06/28/09 |
| Thread: |
|