re: sp? | |
Posted by: ![]() |
daveake 07:03 am UTC 03/02/07 |
In reply to: | re: sp? - rockfenris2005 06:48 am UTC 03/02/07 |
> In Pudding's opinion it's shit. In my opinion, it's good. > Pudding should speak for himself and not on behalf of > everyone else. Well, on behalf of "everyone else", I'd like to ask a simple question, which is: WTF are you on about? "IMO" is only needed when it would otherwise appear that someone is stating fact. Why do you feel Pudding needs to add "IMO" to his post but you don't to yours? Dave | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: sp? - rockfenris2005 10:41 am UTC 03/02/07 |
Next: | re: sp? - rockfenris2005 07:08 am UTC 03/02/07 |
Thread: |
|