| re: BTW |
|
Posted by:
 |
AndrewG 12:19 pm UTC 12/11/10 |
| In reply to: |
re: BTW - Marklbetya 04:38 am UTC 12/11/10 |
|
> They just appreciate the
> theatrics more than I can. I just love his studio
> voice so much, that I can't help but be disappointed now
> that his live voice is so different. I don't know when
> it happened, but the last time I heard him live in good
> voice was about 2000.
Fair enough, but I think age has a lot to do with that.
Before the shows on this tour I was starting to think his studio vocals were heavily manipulated but when I hear how good his voice is at the best parts of the show I can understand how they can achieve those studio vocals. I agree there is a difference but at 63 I think this is still quite a stellar achievement and quite in line with how other rock artists sing at that age.
I noticed some vocal problems of Bruce Springsteen last year at Hyde Park too and that is the first time I heard that at his shows. I think the 60 mark is just quite pivotal. My opinion anyway. I'd still rather see them like this than not at all.
I can understand not going if you are not fussed about the production part as of course that is a large part of what it's about these days.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: BTW - ricgough 04:24 pm UTC 12/11/10 |
| Next: |
re: BTW - crazy_janey 07:33 am UTC 12/12/10 |
|
| Thread: |
|