| re: an apology to Jim - no reply required | |
|
Posted by: |
Conas 11:52 am UTC 01/11/12 |
| In reply to: | re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - Klasien 04:35 am UTC 01/11/12 |
| Klasien you have been on this board for a long time now. If you have think back to all the insane stuff that was written and put up here during the years, how can you possibly get upset over what you wrote? People have said insulting things about Jim many times, and not only on this board but to his face aswell. Last year I insulted Jim far worse than you ever did, but that was only because I was angry at being given no updated info, and felt the fans were being neglected and kept in the dark about everything. > > yes, dear, > > that no reply thing was meant for you. > > > So what? You've never said or posted anything you wish you > hadn't? > I've had to take a good look at myself lately and decided > I didn't like who I was becoming. But what is done is > done. All I can do is apologize and move on. Time and my > actions will tell whether I can change. > > Or perhaps you guys are right and I simply am an > attention-seeking kid. > > -K- > Warning: may contain traces of bitch. > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - Klasien 12:21 pm UTC 01/13/12 |
| Next: | re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - Klasien 12:33 pm UTC 01/11/12 |
| Thread: |
|