not logged in
| re: an apology to Jim - no reply required | |
Posted by:  |
Klasien 12:33 pm UTC 01/11/12 |
| In reply to: | re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - Conas 11:52 am UTC 01/11/12 |
| :) Guess that makes me a better person??? Nah, just kidding... I'm just as twisted as the next girl... (but at least I know it) Conas, I have been here since the 90's, when the board was just a mailing list... and have posted and read my share of shameful comments... the fact that others have said worse, well, that's just not good enough a reason to say things that are hurtful. When it comes to being Steinmaniacs... Left in the Dark is probably the one thing we can count on being??? Though when I remember how much light was shed on my Darkness by his music... For me... I suppose it is time to let go of my feelings of entitlement. When it comes to Jim, I'll take what I can get... whenever I can get it. Even if that means waiting days, weeks, months or years for another political rant and/or baseball rave... Hell, I'd probably drool over his shopping list LOL! I know, it all sounds very sticky-gooey and goody-goody... but I guess this is the growing up I have to do... I have spent 33 years wondering who I am... and whether the way I was treated defined me... (If just about everyone in your life treats you as trash... does that mean you are???) I have finally decided it DOESN'T define me AT ALL!!! I am who I say I am! I may not be high-class... but I am no trash either! For me... that means that my words and actions have to come from the heart from now on. I have to be able to stand behind what I say... regardless of how other people will take it... and making comments intended to be hurtful... well, that is beneath me! why? because I say so. -K- Warning: may contain traces of bitch. > Klasien you have been on this board for a long time now. > If you have think back to all the insane stuff that was > written and put up here during the years, how can you > possibly get upset over what you wrote? People have said > insulting things about Jim many times, and not only on > this board but to his face aswell. Last year I insulted > Jim far worse than you ever did, but that was only because > I was angry at being given no updated info, and felt the > fans were being neglected and kept in the dark about > everything. > > > > > yes, dear, > > > > that no reply thing was meant for you. > > > > > > So what? You've never said or posted anything you wish you > > hadn't? > > I've had to take a good look at myself lately and decided > > I didn't like who I was becoming. But what is done is > > done. All I can do is apologize and move on. Time and my > > actions will tell whether I can change. > > > > Or perhaps you guys are right and I simply am an > > attention-seeking kid. > > > > -K- > > Warning: may contain traces of bitch. > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - Conas 11:52 am UTC 01/11/12 |
| Next: | re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - Rakae 01:25 pm UTC 01/11/12 |
| Thread: |
|